In the adversarial system, which option best describes the sequence of presenting and challenging evidence?

• A. The prosecution presents its case first with evidence and witnesses, followed by the defense with cross-examinations after each witness
• B. The defense presents its case second after the prosecution
• C. There is no cross-examination
• D. The jury decides after a single witness

Answer: (B)

In an adversarial system, the trial unfolds with the prosecution presenting its case first, calling witnesses and presenting evidence, and the defense cross-examining each witness after they are called. After the prosecution rests, the defense then presents its own case in chief, calling its own witnesses and presenting evidence, with the prosecution having the opportunity to cross-examine those witnesses. Cross-examination is a central mechanism for testing credibility throughout the process, and the jury (or judge) renders a verdict after both sides have presented their cases and closing arguments. This sequence—defense presenting its case only after the prosecution has presented its case—best describes how evidence is presented and challenged in the adversarial system.